Compares justice in BILLY BUDD, and TWELVE ANGRY MEN

Changing Verdicts The trials in both billy Budd and Twelve aggravated workforce have a jury of sorts, and in each story, the members of these juries atomic number 18 near unanimous in their stopping point, tho one soulfulness dust who would vote against his/her fellow jurors. As it happens, both juries all in all miscellanea the verdict from what it appeared each jury would have primarily voted. I hope to show you the similarities/differences of these two stories by exposing slanting verdicts and the accompaniment that one person changed the final verdict in both cases. The trial of Billy Budd is a quick one, but preferably a lot of decision-making takes place. Three of the officers on Billys enthrall (the unofficial Corps) are trying to come to a decision as to what should be done about the murder of Claggart. They sock Billy is guilty of the crime, but are willing to impart him on the base that Claggart had it coming to him. The only witness to the crime, ma ster key Vere, reminds the DC that a crime was committed, whether malice was intentional, or unintentional, and that the DC should non bias their verdict simply because Billy is a upright piano person: What shame to us such a think over on their part, and how deadly to discipline.

You see then, whither, prompted by duty and the law, I steadfastly drive. But I beseech you, my friends, do not take me amiss. I feel as you do for this ugly boy. But did he know our hearts, I take him to be of that generous nature that he would feel even for us on whom in this military necessity so dweeb a compulsion laid (Melv ille 70). All of the members of the DC chang! e their verdicts when they fetch that they have been biased from the... If you want to get a fully essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay