The Revolution of 1917 in Petrograd, the Bolsheviks came to power Review Essay Example

The Revolution of 1917 in Petrograd, the Bolsheviks came to power Review Paper Essay on The Revolution of 1917 in Petrograd, the Bolsheviks came to power Alexander Rabinovich was one of the first Western scientists who were able to rethink the nature and significance of the October Revolution, abandoning the formal, conservative and highly simplified view of the events of October 1917 in Russia as an armed coup. The merit of it in an attempt to explore the Russian-Soviet history with the so-called de-ideologized viewpoint. Is this possible? I think no. Be on such a struggle, either theoretically or practically impossible the more -All the same it means to join one of the existing parties for a long time, or rather, in the contemptible middle party » And here he writes about his spiritual evolution Rabinovich.: Getting serious study of Soviet history, I was firmly convinced that the Bolsheviks usurpers, and Bolshevism, Stalinism and the Soviet political system (as it operated at the time) in fact synonymous when I was in college and graduate school in the western historical literature transformations Adalah point of view that the October Revolution was not more than a well-organized coup relatively small isolated handful led by Lenin, radical fanatics  ». It is interesting to notice how the path Rabinovich to the understanding of the October Revolution, were similar with similar discoveries made by other historians of the revolution, who were trying to find the truth honestly, forced to wade through to her perennial ideological lie: Stalinist, soviet-style, neoliberal, and more. al. goal of so-called pluralism of opinions. Another American also a historian-researcher of our revolution Steven Cohen (. The author of the book Political biography Bukharin 1888-1938) in one of his articles rightly observes: We will write a custom essay sample on The Revolution of 1917 in Petrograd, the Bolsheviks came to power Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Revolution of 1917 in Petrograd, the Bolsheviks came to power Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Revolution of 1917 in Petrograd, the Bolsheviks came to power Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer  «The most important, complex and important question posed by the Bolshevik Revolution and its consequences , concerns the relationship between Bolshevism and Stalinism. The essence of this question is the following: is the social and political order established under Stalin in the 1930s, the logical result of continuous of the Bolshevik movement that dominated in Soviet Russia during the first decade after 1917. The answer to this question will inevitably forms a historian looks into many smaller problems relating to the period from 1917 to 1939. It would not be an exaggeration to say the historian of this period: Tell me, how are you to interpret the relationship between Bolshevism and Stalinism, and Ill tell you how you traktuesh almost all the significant events in between. Ultimately, this issue has been and remains a political . (S.Koen. Bolshevism and Stalinism.). In fact, the question that remains is not just political, but also such urgent that there is, apparently, no longer a myth, and no bullshit , which would not popolzovalsya teleistoriki like Svanidze: waived and newly restored holiday on November 7, an attempt to hide in the shade of some unimaginable contrived unity on 4 November, a decree on the Commission to combat the falsification of history, and more. et al. detect the obvious importance of awls, which would love to forever hide or bury the trash in piles ideological. And the myth of the German money, and the job of the spy Trotsky and Lenin, the treachery of a bunch of fools, who came from abroad in a sealed train, etc. etc. typical garbage that abundantly showered and showered the Great Revolution as of post-Soviet and Soviet-ideologists. But it is worth special mention here an important moral component of this attitude of the authorities and ideologues to our stories with you, very accurately noticed by one of the greatest t hinkers of the Soviet years, Mikhail Alexandrovich Lifshitz: Read Montaigne, Pushkin, Tolstoy: no more rudeness than contempt for the people. The people and the crowd is not the same thing. People have created great unity of the revolution, while the crowd, led by demagogues, it corrupts and destroys. Movements such as fascism, is converted into a crowd of people; movements like the October Revolution, the crowd lifted up to the level of the people. These are two opposite flow of forces, global struggle before which the battle of Ormuzd and Ahriman an insignificant episode (From banned in Soviet times, the work The moral significance of the October Revolution) The contempt for the people -. Meanness of spirit, Animal fear of the fate of the fire The fire of war, hunger and devastation let me remind you about the people yes, for him, about the demos of the plebs and cattle, about the soldiery, a black farm laborers, about clots whether disgust whether offenses in their expressive relish spitting. But at a time when interest in the slaughterhouse rogue will all cal people, Which is in the interest of obscurantist The country will not give up and do not shut up your mouth, Then izgoyskoy want to be nature Yu. Moritz (fully see here.) Here is what, finally, our historian Alexander Rabinowitch:.  «I, like almost all of my predecessors who wrote about the revolution, it is difficult to win Bolsheviks without Lenin. Moreover, despite the heated debate and passing in the stormy atmosphere of exchange of views in the Bolshevik Party in 1917, it remained, of course, more united than any other major party, who fought with it for power. Undoubtedly, this was an important factor in its success. And yet I have come to the conclusion that the relative flexibility of the party, as well as its ability to capture the prevailing mood of the masses, contributed to the victory of the Bolsheviks at least as much as the revolutionary discipline, organizational unity and authority of Lenin. I just want to add that, trying to reconstruct the events covered in the book, I tried to let the facts speak for themselves. Are the findings of fact to judge the reader  » Read a book anyone can here: .